Skip to main content

Michael Jackson, meet Richard Nixon

We now know that in 1973, the "private" Richard Nixon spewed racist and anti-Semitic garbage. I say "private" because we hear the pronouncements he made in the Oval Office thanks to the non-stop recording device in his office. Abortion is a good thing for interracial pregnancies (I assume he meant black men impregnating white women) and - oh, yeah - for rape. Nice. Should there be an increase in anti-Semitism, it would all be the Jews' own fault because they were complaining about the increase in evangelical missionary work in the US. Nice.

Apologists are minimizing his spouting filth - at least about Jews - by remarking his loyalty to the State of Israel, as though being an anti-Semite and being a supporter of Israel are mutually exclusive. I disagree. I believe that "Rev." John Hagee is an anti-Semite because he truly believes that we Jews only exist to provide for his desperately anticipated Armageddon - and I believe that he loves Israel for the same reason. I'm sure others can give the poli-sci viewpoint on Nixon's love affair with Eretz Yisraeil; all I can say is that it doesn't matter.

And now Michael Jackson. In a video for "They Don't Care About Us," Jacko - in his wisdom and depth of intellectual prowess - includes "Jew me, sue me" and "Kick me, Kike Me" (you can read the ADL's reaction here). Was Jackson an anti-Semite? Based on eight words, it's hard to tell. I don't believe there's anything else in his repertoire of lyrics that would suggest such a thing ... but I'm pretty sure that had a Jewish performer included racially inflammatory/bigoted crap in one of his/her songs/videos, the world would have been up in arms (so to speak).

But here's what I guaranted is going to happen. Apologists for Nixon will point to Jackson and do their best to make them equivalent in their bigotry. And that just won't fly. Michael Jackson was a pathetic creature, who - by the 1990's - had long seen his peak in creativity and success. Talented, yes. Brilliant dancer, yes. Brilliant in anything else? Please. Nixon, on the other hand, was a sitting president in 1973. Talented, yes. Brilliant, possibly. THE representative of the United States? Absolutely - and therein lies the difference. Any attempt to equate the two is absurd (but again - I guarantee it's going to happen).

Jackson should've stuck to doing the moon walk. Nixon should just have stuck to keeping his mouth shut. The only thing they had in common was a pathetic need to be in control and in the center of the universe

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Erev Rosh Hashanah 5777: WAIT

I got the best advice from my son: "Mom, why are you even engaging with these people? Please stop."

I've got people on Facebook who - while holding similar philosophies in some areas - are 180 degrees from me politically. I long ago determined that arguing with these people is counterproductive, only useful if I believe - science notwithstanding - that heartrate-raising arguments is equal to a good cardio workout.

And so my goal for today is to WAIT (by the way, not an original concept - I learned it from Rabbi Andy Sklarz): Why Am I Talking?

Provocateurs and bullies want to be engaged. They poke, someone responds, and the game is afoot. Like fire, they need constant air renewal. So if don't engage, don't respond, they will run out of air.

So for today, I grit my teeth ... and wait.


Elul 21: The airline safety guide (Love)

You shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am Adonai. (Lev. 19:18)

You shall love the stranger that dwells with you (who will be for you like the native-born among you), as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am Adonai, your God. (Lev. 19:34)

And you shall love Adonai your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your might ... (Deut. 6:5)

If you've paid attention to your flight attendant, you know that in the event of an emergency, you put your own oxygen mask on first. Only then do you help someone next to you, including a child. Why? Because if you don't have oxygen, you're useless to anyone else.

It's the same with love.

Start by loving and caring for yourself. It's not selfish; it's just a place to start.

Then move outward: your neighbor, your community, the strangers around you.

Then, finally, the realm of God: the spiritual love that holds all the others together.

But it all starts in your own home.


Elul 23: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 6:50 (Begin)

Someone I knew hated the expression "new beginning" because it was redundant. The argument was that beginning implies new, right?

Not necessarily. A "do-over" is a beginning of sorts that acknowledges that the first try got muffed up. "Start again, from the beginning" and "begin again" are phrases I use regularly with students and choir singers. A "new" beginning is an attitude, a mindset, an awareness that we have a chance to do something with a fresh take, a new vision. 

Even  בראשית ברא אלוהים, B'reishit bara Elohim, the first words in the Bible, are translated frequently as "when God was beginning," implying that starting this new venture was an ongoing event. It's suggested that God had given this new world thing a go several times already, was about to abandon the effort, and only the angels' intervention gave God the oomph to give it another try ... this time with feeling (as the saying goes).

We're about …